| || |
Right it's time to clear this up from my angle, because i see the snow ball comming.
I think it's terrible people can sell up and travel half way across the world, spend their money on what ever and then get told, your going back. I honestly think it's wrong.
If you add the points up when you first look at this "adventure" and fall short you look at possible other ways to get around it. Once you have found this way you may then put the remote possibilities of return to the back of your mind. Never the less they are still there.
Yes "if you meet all the criteria" everything should be spot on, but who decides who meets this criteria and to what degree? Not me or you thats for sure.
Supply and demand, unfortunately they have little demand, and lots of supply. I DO NOT agree with it, but thats the state of it, at the present moment in time.
My view is that the pathway to permanent residency for s/c 475 and 495 visaholders is not a no risk pathway - but it is a low risk pathway.
In general, so long as you meet the living and working in regional Australia requirements all should be well.
6. If an applicant lodges a valid application for a subclass 887 and meets all the qualifying conditions - admittedly to the satisfaction of the DIAC officer - s/he MUST grant you a permanent residency visa. Anyone who has not been granted such a visa and says there was no good reason for the refusal is - in my view - not telling the whole story.
I know that you help many people. However IF we are refused then I would be greatly offended by this part of your post as we have definitely met all of the criteria. I would even forward my papers to you to prove it! Not that I should have to - I just feel that this was pretty harsh! It would not be that we are "not telling the whole story"!
The only thing that has happened is that OH's skill is no longer on the list.
We have done everything that was asked of us and more.
Sorry I don't let my toys out of the pram very often but on this occassion I felt I had to!
Hi Kangomik, I see no reference to me here in your post, only the fact that you refer to some things I have written in an earlier post. I wonder why you feel it so necessary to get personal! If in deed your post is referring to my text then you don't know me at all. Materialistic I am not Mate. You may not mean to offend but I'm sorry you have.
As far as I'm concerned I wish good luck in what ever you aim for, along with everybody else I meet or talk to and if I disagree with them I will tell them and they will know for sure that it is directed at them so that there is no confusion.
Have a good day mate.
Thank you Alan for your constructive input. It certainly clears a few things up for me. Cheers.