Tamara (Homes Down Under)

Baaad language to sheep!

    Recommended Posts

    Nope, it's not April 1st. Real news item.

     

    Apparently Aussie sheep are getting much more sensitive...or at least the English "speaking" ones!:biglaugh:

     

     

    PETA: You can’t be calling them sh–––, you’ll hurt their feelings

     

    • RASHIDA YOSUFZAI
    • THE COURIER-MAIL
    • MAY 25, 2015 3:48PM

     

     

    external?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcontent.video.news.com.au%2FNDM_CP_-_Reuters%2F863%2F472%2F2011-06-07t165830z_2_love7561b5h40_rtrmadp_baseimage-960x540_file-shrek-the-sheep-o.jpg&width=650&api_key=kq7wnrk4eun47vz9c5xuj3mc

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Coastal Island Becomes a Summer Camp for Sheep

     

     

    071014SHEEP2_1280x720.jpg&width=650&api_key=kq7wnrk4eun47vz9c5xuj3mc

     

     

     

     


      [*=left]

     

     

     

    NEW South Wales farmer Ken Turner didn’t know you could offend sheep with rude words.

    That was until the RSPCA came knocking on the door of his Boorungie Station, about 130km from ­Broken Hill, acting on a tip-off.He was told People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) had lodged a complaint with the RSPCA that a farm worker swore at sheep during shearing sessions.The group presented footage of the “verbal abuse”, believed to have been recorded by an undercover operative working at the same station.Apparently the rude word words were distressing the flock.index

    “None of them actually told me they were offended,” a bemused Mr Turner said on radio.“I still haven’t had a sheep come to me (to complain) – they didn’t even look offended to me after they were shorn.“They just walked down to the paddock, grazed intently, and I didn’t notice any distress attached to them.” Mr Turner hasn’t seen the footage alleging he sanctioned such behaviour, so he doesn’t know what kind of rude words were apparently used.But he took a guess: “From time to time everybody lets out a golly gosh occasionally,” he said.RSPCA NSW chief executive Steve Coleman said the case was “rare” and was treated seriously by officers but eventually dismissed.“If there is an allegation that puts at risk an animal that would cause it unnecessary suffering and distress, we would investigate it,” he said.“I don’t know if it matters what language is used.“An animal is not going to understand it.”Mr Coleman told ABC radio the video would not have been usable in a legal case and the matter was formally dropped.“We felt the footage was inadmissable and therefore we relied on what oral evidence came from both parties,” he said. “It was conflicting and on that basis we were unable to continue. The evidence that was available basically came down to one person’s word against another.”Mr Turner says he’s annoyed the complaint took resources away from the RSPCA.“I thought, is this a joke? Is this April fools?“It’s just sad because there possibly are legitimate cases that should be investigated.”\PETA has been running an anti-wool campaign and last month angered Queensland’s farming community with fake images posted online of a bloodied lamb, supposedly hurt during shearing and the slogan: “Here’s the rest of your wool coat.”The group created controversy in Britain this week, calling for the name of the country’s oldest pub to be changed. PETA claimed that “Ye Olde Fighting Cocks” is ­offensive to chickens and should be changed to “Ye Olde Clever Cock” to celebrate them as ­intelligent, sensitive and social creatures.– additional reporting AAP359735-f731cdd8-0035-11e5-9cd4-3a82df739478.jpg

    “They just walked down to the paddock, grazed intently, and I didn’t notice any distress ...” NSW Picture: Andy Rogers

     

     

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Although the story is funny - I especially liked "“They just walked down to the paddock, grazed intently, and I didn’t notice any distress ...” - you have to wonder at the people involved in PETA thinking that doing things like this is going to get them anywhere but ridiculed.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    It's a shame, PETA seem to attract some really negative attention, which then works against some of the good stuff they do.

     

    :frown:

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now